Brooks v. Mayor of Baltimore
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City. This case was submitted on bill and answer in the Court below, and by agreement of counsel a decree joro forma was passed, refusing the injunction prayed for by the complainants and dismissing their bill. Erom this decree the complainants appealed. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBrent, J.
The Mayor and City Council of Baltimore hy Ordinance No. 90, approved May 23rd, 1876, directed the Commissioners for opening streets in that city to extend and widen Eutaw street, and to extend Eutaw Place from Laurens street to North avenue — the latter being the boundary in that direction of the city limits. The property of the appellants lies outside of the city limits, but adjacent to the improvements contemplated by this ordinance. Under the Act of 1838, codified in Art. 4, sec. 837, in relation to the City of Baltimore, Code of Public Local Laxos, they have been assessed for benefits…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Alexander v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1847
3Cited by14 opinions
- Leonardo v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
- Hayden v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
- People v. Drainage Comrs.Illinois Supreme Court · 1892
- Mallery v. QuinnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
- Maryland Racing Commission v. Maryland Jockey ClubCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.