Legal Opinion
Cohen v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 2, 1928No. 341PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtL. Hand, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The chief question is the charge of the judge on the issue of subornation. Whether it was a matter on which he was called upon to charge at all we have not to decide. The bankrupts corroborated each other in fact as to thfe subornation, and, if the judge had said nothing on the subject, the point might have arisen whether the doctrine requires more than that corroboration is necessary if the case is to go to the jury at all. In fact, he went further and charged them that no corroboration was necessary as to the subornation. If this is wrong in law, we…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Hammer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
- Harrison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
- The People v. . EvansNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- A. Ray Segal v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957
- State v. SanchezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Hart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
- Hourie v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Tipton v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.