Legal Opinion

State v. Schrempp

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 2016No. 27461PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KERN, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Defendant was indicted for eight drug-related offenses in March 2014 and convicted of seven of the eight counts. On appeal, defendant contends she is entitled to a new trial because the trial court erred by amending the indictment the day prior to trial. Defendant also argues she was prejudiced when the trial court failed to notify the parties of a jury question that arose during deliberations and then an swered the question without input from the parties. We affirm.

Background

[¶ 2.] Brooke Schrempp resided in Sioux Falls with her boyfriend, Christopher Uhing. The…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. United States v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. State v. RhinesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. McMillenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  2. State v. McMillenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  3. State v. HillyerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025
  4. Shawn Sorensen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2025
  5. State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Noel Cortez, AppellantCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2025

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API