E & J GALLO WINERY v. Morand Bros. Beverage Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ST. EVE, District Judge.
Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant E & J Gallo Winery has moved to strike or dismiss Defendants’ First Amended Counterclaim. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs motion is granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff E & J Winery (“E & J”), a California corporation with its principal place of business in Modesto, California, and Defendants Morand Brothers Beverage Company (“Morand”), Central Wholesale Company (“Central”), Mueller Distributing Company, Inc. (“Mueller”) and Paramount Distributing Company, Inc. (“Paramount”) 1 were…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Emil J. Bartholet v. Reishauer A.G. (Zurich) and Reishauer Corporation (Elgin)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Ellis Henderson v. Michael F. Sheahan and J.W. FairmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Randolph L. Cook v. Oprah WinfreyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Abraham Alvarado-Morales v. Digital Equipment Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- George A. Fuller Co., a Division of Northrop Corporation v. Chicago College of Osteopathic Medicine, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Siegel v. HSBC Holdings, PLCDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2017
- Atiq v. WSH Packaging Systems, LTD.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025
- Baranowska v. Intertek Testing Services NA, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
- Chavez v. The City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
- DreamPak, LLC v. Infodata CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.