Legal Opinion

Dukore v. District of Columbia

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided August 25, 2015No. 13-7150PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge MILLETT.

MILLETT, Circuit Judge:

The “Occupy Movement” claims as its purpose the exposure of “how the wealthiest 1% of society are promulgating an unfair global economy!.]” Second Amended Complaint ¶ 11. A “core component” of the movement’s message is “peaceful protests, or ‘occupations’ ” accomplished through the “physical occupation” of public spaces, which is “expressed through the establishment of tents.” Id. ¶ 14.

In the District of Columbia, however, a municipal regulation forbids any person from “set[ting] up, maintainfing], or establishing]…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Reichle v. HowardsSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. Clark v. Community for Creative Non-ViolenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. North American Butterfly Association v. Chad F. WolfCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020
  2. Hargraves v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  3. Shabtai Shatsky v. Palestine Liberation OrganizationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020
  4. Kyle v. BedlionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  5. Michael J. Daugherty & Labmd, Inc. v. SheerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API