Marlowe v. Commonwealth

Opinion

COLEMAN, J.

John Pierrepont Marlowe appeals his convictions by a jury for enticement and aggravated sexual battery of two minors under the age of thirteen years. He contends: (1) that the Commonwealth’s rebuttál argument to the jury violated his due process protections by interjecting facts not in evidence; and (2) that the court erred when, in response to a question submitted by the jury during deliberations, it stated that in order to convict it was not necessary to find that one of the offenses was committed on the specific date of February 17, 1984. We find no error, and affirm the…