Kinzey v. Kinzey
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Lafayette Circuit Court — Hon. Richard-Field, Judge. (1) A party who by means of the confidential relations between the parties by deceit and imposition obtains property of ,the other will be compelled, in a proper case, by a court of equity, to restore the same to the party injured. Dickerson v. Dickerson, 39 N. W. Rep.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Lafayette Circuit Court — Hon. Richard-Field, Judge. (1) A party who by means of the confidential relations between the parties by deceit and imposition obtains property of ,the other will be compelled, in a proper case, by a court of equity, to restore the same to the party injured. Dickerson v. Dickerson, 39 N. W. Rep. (Neb.) 429; Huguenin v. Beasley, 14 Yes. 290; Taylor v. Taylor, 8 How. 183; Blancly v. Kimber, 24 Beav. 148; Goddard v. Carlisle, 9 Price, 169; Boneyv. Hollingsworth, 23 Ala. 69. (2) A court of equity will scrutinize the matter from its inception. It is not a…
1Opinion of the CourtBrace, J.
On the ninth of April, 1874, the plaintiff Christian Kinzey and the defendant Clara E. Kinzey were lawfully married, and thereafter lived together as husband and wife until the month of November in the year 1888, when they separated. Afterwards in August, 1889, at the suit of the said Christian Kinzey, a decree of divorce was granted him by the circuit court of LaFayette county, on the ground of adultery committed by his said wife, during the marital relation, with one John A. Catron.
It appears from the evidence that at the time of the marriage the said Christian Kinzey was a farmer and a…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Thomas v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Curd v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
- Davison v. DavisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
- Crise v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926
- Keefe v. KeefeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.