Legal Opinion

Adams v. Phillips

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 15, 1883PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Elmore Chancery Court. Heard before J. M. EalkNer, Esquire, acting as Special Chancellor. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtBrickell, C. J.

The bills, original and amended, are fíled to enforce the lien of a vendor on lands for the payment of the purchase-money. The cause was before the court at a former term, on appeal from a decree of the chancellor overruling a demurrer to the original bill, assigning as a cause that by the bill it was affirmatively shown the contract, or agreement of the purchaser to pay the purchase-money, was within the statute of frauds.—Phillips v. Adams, 70 Ala. 373. The decree was reversed,' and the cause remanded ; and in the court of chancery the amended bill was filed, alleging, in addition to the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Henry Miller's Heirs & Devisees v. M'IntyreSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  2. King v. AverySupreme Court of Alabama · 1861
  3. Blackwell's Adm'r v. Blackwell's DistributeesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858
  4. Pitts v. PowledgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  5. Cain v. GimonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1860

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Truss v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  2. Alabama Terminal & Inprovement Co. v. Hall & FarleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  3. Nelson v. First National Bank of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1903
  4. Brackin v. NewmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  5. Seibs v. EngelhardtSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API