Legal Opinion

American Nat. Ins. Co. v. Walstrom

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 13, 1933No. 1 Div. 761PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Justice.

In Providence Savings Life Assurance Soc. v. Pruett, 141 Ala. 688, 37 So. 700, where certain provisions of a life insurance policy were sought to he pleaded in defense of a suit thereon, it was ruled the pleas were defective by reason of the words “among other things” (referring to provisions of the policy contract) based upon the theory that for all shown by the plea the “other things” averred to be in the contract may have so controlled the particular provision set up as to show it was not intended to be and was not in fact as it purports upon its face. Hunt v. Preferred…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Independent Life Ins. Co. v. ButlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  2. Massachusetts Mut. L. I. Co. v. CrenshawSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  3. Brown v. Freeman & BynumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  4. Providence Savings Life Assurance Society v. PruettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  5. Providence Saving Life Insurance Society v. PruettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Accident Indemnity Insurance Company v. FeelySupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  2. Vredenburgh v. Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  3. United Insurance Company of America v. RaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  4. Columbian Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. VasserSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  5. Henderson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API