James Julian, Inc. v. Hall
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
BALICK, Judge:
In this action plaintiff, a highway construction firm, asserts various claims for damages relating to contracts with the State for construction of two stretches of 1-95. The State has filed a motion to dismiss 'for failure to exhaust the administrative remedy. The parties have agreed that the court can decide the factual issues raised by the motion on the record without a hearing.
The State’s motion is based on the following statute:
The execution and performance of all contracts awarded by the Department shall be under the charge of the Secretary of Highways and Transportation,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Shellhorn & Hill, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1962
- George & Lynch, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1964
- DuPont v. DuPontSupreme Court of Delaware · 1966
- Kuhn Construction Company v. StateSuperior Court of Delaware · 1968
3Cited by2 opinions
- Levinson v. Delaware Compensation Rating Bureau, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1992
- Adorno v. CordreySuperior Court of Delaware · 2020