Shreveport Laundries, Inc. v. Teagle
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtTaliaferro, J.
These two cases involve practically the same issues and legal principles, and have been consolidated for trial in this court. Each defendant, while in the employ of plaintiff as solicitor and collector on a designated route in the city of Shreveport, was required to sign a written contract containing, among other provisions, the following, viz.:
“First.
“The Company hereby employs the Solicitor to solicit customers for laundry, dry cleaning and other services performed by it; to receive from and deliver to such customers all clothing and other articles the subject of such services and to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Murray v. BarnhartSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
- Blanchard v. HaberSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
- Campbell v. A. Lambert & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1884
- Heeb v. Codifer & Bonnabel, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
- Caddo Oil & Mining Co. v. Producers' Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Martin-Parry Corp. v. New Orleans Fire Detection ServiceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
- Wisconsin Ice & Coal Co. v. LuethWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Johnson v. Mansfield Hardwood Lumber CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1958
- Hanks v. Shreveport Yellow Cabs, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
- Georesearch, Inc. v. MorrissDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1961
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.