Legal Opinion
B & J Manufacturing Co. v. D.A. Frost Industries, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided February 4, 1985No. C83-1731PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION
MANOS, District Judge.
On April 22, 1983, B & J Manufacturing Company (B & J), filed the above-captioned case seeking injunctive relief, damages and attorney’s fees due to the alleged infringement of its United States Letter Patent No. 3,879,825, (hereinafter, ’825), by the defendants, D.A. Frost Industries, Inc., and its President, David A. Frost, (hereinafter referred to collectively as Frost). Jurisdiction is invoked under 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a).1 On May 6, 1983, Frost filed an answer alleging that the ’825 patent is invalid and a counterclaim for “false marking” under 35…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Milton Lecompte v. Mr. Chip, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Clayton E. Durham v. Florida East Coast Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- James Hamilton, as Administrator of the Estate of Gordon Daniel Hamilton, Deceased v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- HOME OWNERS'LOAN CORPORATION v. HuffmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- Tyco Laboratories, Inc. v. Koppers Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Tutu Wells Contamination LitigationDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1998
- Setty v. Village of RussellvilleDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022