Legal Opinion

Maples v. Muscletech, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided January 16, 2002No. 07-01-0471-CVPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR TEMPORARY STAY

2Per curiam

In the proceeding underlying this interlocutory appeal, appellants Scott Maples, his wife Rachel Maples, and TBA, Inc. (TBA) asked us to stay a temporary in junction granted by the trial court. The basis of their request is that the bond set by the trial court is inadequate to protect them from the potential damage they would suffer if it develops that the injunction was improperly granted. For reasons we later state, we overrule the request.

The underlying dispute centers on a licensing agreement executed in July 2000, between the Maples and Muscletech, Inc.…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lamar Builders, Inc. v. Guardian Savings & Loan Ass'n, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1990
  2. Stone v. Griffin Communications & Security Systems, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2001

4Cited by12 opinions

  1. IAC, LTD. v. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2005
  2. Khaledi v. H.K. Global Trading, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2003
  3. Oryon Technologies, Inc. and Oryon Technologies, LLC v. M. Richard Marcus, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014
  4. Eugenio Falcon, Antonio Falcon, Eloy Vera, Juan D. Posada, Jose Vasquez, Karina Mascorro and William Smith v. Bonanza Capital, Ltd. and Bernay Box as Trustee of Bonanza Master Fund, Ltd. Liquidating Trust, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2012
  5. Hanlon Gas Processing, Ltd. and Permian Leasing, L.L.C. v. Eastland County Guardian, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API