Legal Opinion

Leydecker v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 7, 1942No. 45299Published

1Opinion of the Court

*713The court decided that the plaintiff was entitled to recover in an opinion fer curiam, as follows:

The defendant does not deny plaintiff’s mother was solely dependent upon him for support. It is clear that she was. Accordingly, plaintiff is entitled to the additional allowance for a dependent, as provided for by law. See Barnes v. United States, 95 C. Cls. 411; Ficklen v. United States, 95 C. Cls. 531; Van Auken v. United States, No. 44646, decided by this court November 2, 1942.

Entry of judgment will be suspended until the incoming of a report from the General Accounting Office showing the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barnes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1942
  2. Ficklen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API