Leydecker v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
*713The court decided that the plaintiff was entitled to recover in an opinion fer curiam, as follows:
The defendant does not deny plaintiff’s mother was solely dependent upon him for support. It is clear that she was. Accordingly, plaintiff is entitled to the additional allowance for a dependent, as provided for by law. See Barnes v. United States, 95 C. Cls. 411; Ficklen v. United States, 95 C. Cls. 531; Van Auken v. United States, No. 44646, decided by this court November 2, 1942.
Entry of judgment will be suspended until the incoming of a report from the General Accounting Office showing the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Barnes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1942
- Ficklen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1942