Legal Opinion

Brinkley v. Freedom National Bank of New York

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 22, 1968No. 1694PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OWEN, Judge.

A summary final judgment was entered in a replevin action, by virtue of which appellee was adjudged to be entitled to possession of a certain motor vehicle and to recover of and from the appellants and the surety on the forthcoming bond the value thereof. On the basis of the record as it existed at the time of the entry of the summary final judgment, it appears that appellee as the moving party has not met the Holl1 standards and accordingly we hold that the trial court was in error in entering the summary final judgment.

Appellee alleged and established by affidavit the following…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Holl v. TalcottSupreme Court of Florida · 1966
  2. Emile v. First National Bank of MiamiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  3. Underwriters Insurance Co. v. SisungDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  4. Biro v. GeiserSupreme Court of Florida · 1967
  5. City of Cars, Inc. v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Grimes v. HoltDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  2. W&J CONST. v. Fanning/Howey AssociatesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  3. Northside Motors, Inc. v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  4. Hines Truck Stop, Inc. v. Cape Fear Motor Lines, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API