Legal Opinion

State v. Fox

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1975No. 2952PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLOHAN, Justice.

The defendant, Francis W. Fox, pled guilty to second degree murder for which he was sentenced to confinement for a term of 14 to 18 years. He filed a timely appeal.

The appellant has attacked the legal sufficiency of the plea in the following respects :

1. An intelligent plea was not entered because a) the appellant misunderstood the plea bargain, b) appellant may have been misled by counsel and c) appellant was not advised of his right to remain silent.

2. Appellant was not allowed to withdraw his guilty plea under the plea bargain where psychiatric testing showed a possible…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. State v. DarlingArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. ParrArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  5. State v. CrowleyArizona Supreme Court · 1974

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. FreeIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  2. People v. MatthewsColorado Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. State v. RaseleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  4. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  5. People v. FreeIllinois Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API