Legal Opinion

Equity Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Harrell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 24, 1923No. 898. [fn*]PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

Appellees instituted this suit against appellants upon a fire policy covering a gin risk in the following amounts: On a two-story frame building, $740; on fixed and movable machinéis, etc., $2,000; on motors, dynamos, and other electrical equipment, etc., $750 — total $3,500.

Appellants plead as their defense against said policy certain warranties and representations, which we will set out in our discussion of the issues raised thereunder.

On a trial to a jury on the following special issues, answered as indicated:

“(1) Was J. H. Alderman, or the Alderman Insurance Agency, the agent of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wagner & Chabot v. Westchester Fire InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Westers Union Telegraph Co. v. CooperTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. EndeTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Aetna Insurance v. HolcombTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Delaware Insurance v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1901

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Boston Ins. Co. v. RainwaterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  2. Southern Underwriters v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  3. Southern Mut. Fire Ins. v. Mazoch Bros.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. Lee v. Mutual Protective Ass'n of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  5. Western Indemnity Co. v. ToennisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API