Legal Opinion

West Duluth Land Co. v. Kurtz

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 13, 1891PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by defendants from a judgment of the district court for St. Louis county, where the action was tried by Mills, J., (acting for a judge of the 11th district.)

1Opinion of the Court

Mitchell, J.1

Action to determine adverse claim to real property situated in St. Louis county. The defendants claim title as heirs-at-law of one George Leidner, who died in 1860, intestate, and seised of the property in controversy. The plaintiff' claims title from the same source, under a sale by the guardian of the defendants (then minors) under a license from the probate court of St. Louis county. The guardian who made this sale was the mother of the defendants, who was appointed by the probate court of that county March 2, 1872, the defendants being residents of Wisconsin, where they lived…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Davis v. HudsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kurtz v. St. Paul & Duluth R. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  2. Prokosch v. BrustSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  3. Griffin v. Lenawee Probate JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  4. People ex rel. Kaiser v. MedartAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API