Pryor v. Merchants Mutual Casualty Co.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGr. Robert Witmer, J.
The facts underlying these motions are that on December 2, 1956 the infant plaintiff, Janice Deuel, and defendant Rodney Deuel, being unmarried and residents of New York State, were riding in said defendant’s ear in the State of Pennsylvania, defendant driving and plaintiff as passenger, and were involved in an automobile accident in which plaintiff was injured. Defendant had casualty insurance on his automobile with the defendant Merchants Mutual Casualty Co. Plaintiff alleges in one of her causes of action that on December 14,1956 the agent of said company discussed with her the settlement…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mertz v. MertzNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Rozell v. RozellNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Coster v. CosterNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Schultz v. . SchultzNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Lubowitz v. TainesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Riley v. Capital Airlines, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1960
- Chowdry v. CunninghamDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
- Lauterbach v. FleischerNew York Supreme Court · 1961