Legal Opinion

United States v. Pete

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 20, 1953No. Cr. 199-53Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing

Upon consideration of the Government’s motion for rehearing of defendant’s motion to suppress evidence, granted by this Court by memorandum opinion dated March 23, 1953, the Court concludes that its order should be vacated and defendant’s motion denied.

Defendant’s standing to challenge the admission of evidence must rest upon a claim of ownership or possession of the property seized. Washington v. United States, 1953, 91 U.S.App.D.C.-, 202 F.2d 214, and cases cited. Jeffers v. United States, 1950, 88 U.S.App.D.C. 58, 187 F.2d 498, affirmed, 1951, 342 U.S. 48, 72 S.Ct. 93, 96 L.Ed.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. JeffersSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Jeffers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
  3. Washington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
  4. Moses v. TaylorDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1888
  5. Hattiesburg Auto Sales Co. v. MorrisonMississippi Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API