Legal Opinion

Barker v. Kruckenberg

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided February 4, 2005No. Nos. 91,648; 91,661Published

1Opinion of the Court

Malone, J.;

Patrick N. Barker brought suit against Gene Kruckenberg and other individuals seeking termination of two oil and gas leases on Barker s property known as the Hirt lease and the *546Barker lease. The district court found that the Hirt lease had been forfeited and terminated the lease. The district court refused to terminate the Barker lease. Kruckenberg appeals the district court’s decision terminating tire Hirt lease. Barker cross-appeals the district court’s decision refusing to terminate the Barker lease.

Factual and procedural background

The parties stipulated to tire underlying facts…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Heiman v. ParrishSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  2. Cowman v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  3. In Re Harris Testamentary TrustSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  4. Thurner v. KaufmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
  5. Bloom v. RughSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API