Smith v. State

The appellant was convicted for having committed the crime of murder, he was sentenced to life imprisonment, and he has appealed. We affirm the judgment rendered below.

1. Appellant’s first contention is that the trial court committed error in denying his motion for a.new trial on the general grounds. We have reviewed the transcript, and the evidence adequately supports the verdict rendered by the jury.

2. Appellant’s second contention is that .the trial court committed error in allowing jury consideration of pre-trial statements, including a taped statement, made by appellant. Appellant’s…