Vinales v. State

These consolidated appeals arise out of the same trial in which the three defendants, De Castro, Alvarez and yinales, pled nolo contendere to multiple counts of bookmaking,1 and reserved the right to appeal their motions to suppress evidence. The same points raised in these motions are now before us on appeal.

Each defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the evidence procured by the State pursuant to orders for the interception of wire communications entered under author*571ity of Section 934.09, Florida Statutes (1977). In this regard, it is argued that the…