Legal Opinion

Walsh v. Schmigelski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 26, 2006PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for medical malpractice and lack of informed consent, etc., the defendants Carl D. Schmigelski, Nassau Anesthesia Associates, EC., and Virginia O’Connor appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roberto, J.), dated September 27, 2005, as granted that branch of the plaintiffs’ motion which was for leave to renew their prior motion to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them, which had been granted in an order of the same court dated May 4, 2005, and, upon renewal, in effect,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dahlin v. PaladinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Gallagher v. Daniella's RestaurantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Clemente v. Carl Bongiorno & Sons, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Gale v. LotitoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. Marcus & Co. v. PescitelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. Butler v. City of Rye Flanning CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  5. Butler v. City of Rye Flanning CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API