Hillhouse v. Hillhouse
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.
When a divorce is sought by the wife against her husband under section 7409 of the Code of 1923, the bill of complaint need not go into the details "frith particularity, but it should, at least, give the nature and character of the acts or conduct relied upon to establish the charge. McMahon v. McMahon, 170 Ala. 338, 54 So. 165, and eases there cited. Tutwiler v. Tutwiler, 205 Ala. 283, 87 So. 852. The trial court erred in not sustaining the respondent’s demurrer to paragraph 4 of the bill of complaint.
The case of Ratcliff v. Ratcliff, 209 Ala. 377, 96 So. 422, is not opposed to this ruling.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Farley v. FarleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
- McMahon v. McMahonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Holston v. HolstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
- Ratcliff v. RatcliffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Tutwiler v. TutwilerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
3Cited by5 opinions
- Harris v. HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- Marcum v. MarcumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- Holt v. HoltSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- Russell v. RussellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- Sapp v. SappSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945