Legal Opinion

Willner v. Mink Restaurant Co.

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided August 15, 1908PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion to dismiss complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtFinelite, J.

This is a motion to dismiss the complaint for want of prosecution. Issue was joined on October 18, 1905, and both parties noticed the action for trial for the term commencing the first Monday of November, 1905, for which term a note of issue had been filed by the plaintiff. The action remained on the calendar of this court until October, 1906, when it was not included in the new calendar then made up pursuant to the rule adopted by the justices of this court in June, 1906, which rule is as follows: “ Ordered that the Clerk of the City Court of the City of New York make a new calendar of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gormerly v. . McGlynnNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Rauchberger v. Interurban Street Railway Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1907
  3. Sayer v. KirchhofNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Willner v. Mink Restaurant Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API