Whited v. State

ORDER

William Whited appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 1 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Whited argues that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate and call a witness. The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

1. All references to Rules are to Missouri Supreme Court Rules (2008).