Hayward v. United States
United States Court of Claims
The Reporters’ statement of tbe case: As this case was not appealable no finding's of fact were filed by the court, but the essential facts will be found in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtWeldoN, J.
This suit grows out of the improvements of the Muskingum River, in the State of Ohio, by the defendants in the year 1888-89, and is founded upon an alleged taking of land belonging to the claimant as executor. This case is similar in some respects to the case of John H. Morris, decided at the present term of the court, and grows out of the same transaction, but differs from it in the essential particulars that in this case there was no taking and appropriation of land in an appreciable quantity by the defendants.
The claimant, as the executor of the last will and testament of said decedent,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Schillinger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Langford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- United States v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Schillinger v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1889
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bettini v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
- Thune v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- Jackson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1896
- Nazelrod v. GARRETT COUNTY SANITARY DISTRICT, INC.District Court, D. Maryland · 2003