Legal Opinion
Drake v. Pierce Butler Radiator Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 10, 1952PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMalpass, J.
This is an application in behalf of the attorneys for the plaintiff above named, who will be referred to herein as petitioners, for an order declaring that said attorneys have a *936lien upon the judgment procured by the plaintiff herein which petitioners claim is superior to any setoff granted to the defendant by reason of the amount remaining unpaid on a judgment now held by the defendant against the plaintiff and his wife, Mary B. Drake.
It appears that the plaintiff, Ernest A. Drake, acted as distributor of the products manufactured by the defendant under the terms of a so-called…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Fischer-Hansen v. . Bklyn. Heights R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Matter of HeinsheimerNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Robinson v. . RogersNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Beecher v. Peter A. Vogt Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Pond v. . HarwoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mtr. of City of New York (Usa Coblentz)New York Court of Appeals · 1959
- In re General Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors of Diesel Motors Co., New York County Courts1973
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Atom Foreign Auto Parts, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1982
- American E Group LLC v. LiveWire Ergogenics Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Drake v. Pierce Butler Radiator Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.