In the Interest of A. M. A.

RUFFIN, Presiding Judge.

A juvenile court found A. M. A. delinquent for the offense of aggressive driving. In her sole enumeration of error on appeal, A. M. A. challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. Because the evidence supports the juvenile court’s finding, we affirm.

On appeal from a delinquency adjudication, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to support the juvenile court’s findings. “Moreover, the juvenile court judge, as trier of fact, resolves conflicts in the evidence, and this Court reviews only the sufficiency, not the weight, of the evidence.”

Viewed in this light,…