Legal Opinion

Penland v. Long

District Court, W.D. North Carolina

Decided February 26, 1996No. Civil A. Nos. 1:94CV119, 1:94CV137Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

THORNBURG, District Judge.

THESE MATTERS are before the Court on the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion to Amend Answer, both filed October 16, 1995. The Plaintiffs filed a request for a hearing on the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment on February 20, 1996. For the reasons stated below, the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is denied, the Defendant’s Motion to Amend Answer is granted, and the Plaintiff's request for a hearing on the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is denied.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On July 17, 1993, an inmate…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Rosenblatt v. BaerSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API