Legal Opinion

Thomason v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 29, 1924No. 8485PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorrow, P. J.

It is charged in the indictment that -the appellant “did then and there unlawfully and willfully, by loud and • vociferous talking, disturb a congregation,” etc.

The witness, Duke, was conducting a religious service in a church. Observing a confusion in the congregation, he called for order. According to this witness, every one ceased talking except the appellant, who was talking to the Pierce girls. The witness said:

“I could see him talking, and he was talking loud enough that I could hear the noise of his voice, but could not understand what he was saying.”

The witness remarked that he hoped…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tom West v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936
  2. Ex Parte TraftonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1954
  3. Ex Parte TraftonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1954
  4. Ex parte TraftonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API