Glona v. American Guarantee & Liability Insurance
Supreme Court of the United States
1Dissent
Mr. Justice Harlan, whom Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Stewart join,
dissenting.*
These decisions can only be classed as constitutional curiosities.
At common law, no person had a legally cognizable interest in the wrongful death of another person, and no person could inherit the personal right of another to recover for tortious injuries to his body.1 By statute, Louisiana has created both rights in favor of certain classes of persons. The question in these cases is whether the way in which Louisiana has defined the classes of persons who may recover is constitutionally permissible. The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- De Sylva v. BallentineSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Van Beeck v. Sabine Towing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Insurance Co. v. BrameSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Seaboard Air Line Railway v. KenneySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Vaughan v. Dalton-Lard Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.