Legal Opinion

United States v. J. D.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 4, 1981No. 81 Cr. 0008 (RWS)PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWEET, District Judge.

The three defendants in the above-captioned action are alleged to have attempted the robbery of a branch of the Manufacturer’s Hanover Trust Company in the Bronx in January, 1981. At the time of the alleged offense, all three defendants were under the age of eighteen, and were therefore “juveniles” within the meaning of that term as used in the federal Juvenile Delinquency statute, 18 U.S.C. § 5031, et seq. The government has moved to transfer these defendants to adult status pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 5032. In opposition to the government’s motion, attorneys for two of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Giaccio v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. State v. GibbsIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  3. United States v. William David HillCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
  4. United States v. E. K.District Court, D. Oregon · 1979
  5. United States v. Antonio Frasquillo-ZomosaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States v. Alex Wong, Roger Kwok, Chen I. Chung, Tung Tran, Danny Ngo, Brian Chan, Joseph Wang, Chiang T. Cheng, and Steven NgCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  2. United States v. Roy Mason AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  3. United States v. Juvenile Male 1Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  5. In Re J. Anthony G.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API