Tropicana Pools South, Inc. v. Chamberlain
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
ON REHEARING
MARVIN, Judge.
After reconsideration of the entire record and for the reasons stated, we reverse our original determination that the peremptory exception of no right of action was properly sustained by the court below.
Tropicana Pools South, Inc. brought suit on the contract against the defendant. The contract was signed by the defendant and by William Russell, who signed without indicating that he was an agent or employee of anyone. The defendant filed an *31exception of no cause of action and no right of action contending that Tropicana Pools South, Inc. was not the “proper party…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Invest, Incorporated v. StateLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
- Childers v. Police JuryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1928
- Herbert v. American Soc. of Composers, Authors & PublishersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1946
3Cited by3 opinions
- Holland America Insurance Company v. Succession of Shepherd J. Roy, the Union Bank and Central Pecan Shelling Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Feazel v. FeazelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
- Cooper v. OlindeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990