Legal Opinion

Guardianship of Breslin

California Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1901No. S.F. No. 1878PublishedCited by 15 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco ordering the payment of money by the guardian of an insane person. J. V. Coffey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.

This is an appeal by John Breslin, guardian of the above-named insane person, from an order of the superior court, sitting in probate, ordering and adjudging him to forthwith pay to the Napa state asylum the sum of $2,475. The proceeding was instituted by petition of John F. Carrere,' secretary of the state commission in lunacy, in which it is averred that the estate of the ward is indebted to the state of California for his care and treatment for a period not definitely stated, “in the sum of - dollars.” The guardian appeared and objected to any further proceeding in the matter, on the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smith v. WesterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. In re the Estate of BurtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Bath v. ValdezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Chever v. Ching Hong PoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Theller v. SuchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Department of Mental Hygiene v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  2. Schram v. PooleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
  3. Estate of GestnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Evans v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Setzer v. Department of Mental HygieneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API