Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Olenick

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 3, 1908No. Gen No. 13,864PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Forcible entry and detainer. Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Mancha Brttggemeyer, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Freeman

The defendants in error—hereinafter called plaintiffs—obtained a judgment in forcible entry and detainer against the plaintiff in error—hereinafter called defendant. The plaintiffs brought suit, claiming to be the only heirs at law of Jane Ottman, deceased. The cause was submitted to the Municipal Court upon an agreed statement of facts. From that statement it appears, among other things, that at the time of her death said Jane Ottman was seized in fee of the premises described in the complaint, and that she left an instrument purporting to be her last will and testament, in which one John T.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re probate of the will of StoreyIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Schofield v. ThomasIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Ford v. FordAppellate Court of Illinois · 1905

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People Ex Rel. Kagy v. SeidelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API