Legal Opinion

State v. Baker

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 2, 2013No. AC 34237PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROBINSON, J.

The defendant, James Baker, appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his motion to correct an illegal sentence. On appeal, he claims that the sentencing court improperly denied his motion because it failed to provide him with an opportunity to aJlocute prior to the sentence being imposed. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our resolution of this appeal. On October 13, 1999, the defendant pleaded guilty pursuant to the Alford doctrine1 to possession of a weapon in a correctional institution in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. StricklandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  3. State v. ValedonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  4. HPT v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
  5. State v. HallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. PattersonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  2. State v. Anthony D.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
  3. State v. FairchildConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015
  4. State v. GamerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API