Legal Opinion

Sheriffs v. City of Chicago

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1905PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. W. H. Hinebaugh, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hand

This was a proceeding under section 59 of the Local Improvement act, to confirm a supplemental assessment to pay a claimed deficiency for a street improvement in South Jefferson street from West Sixteenth street to West Twenty-second street, in the city of Chicago. The appellant filed objections, which were overruled, and judgment of confirmation having been entered against his property he has prosecuted this appeal, and urges two grounds for reversal: First, the court erred in confirming said supplemental assessment, as it was spread before the improvement was completed and the cost thereof…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. NoonanIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  2. McChesney v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Cody v. Town of CiceroIllinois Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Poolman v. LangdonWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Hinsdale Sanitary District v. WashburnIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Village of Lombard v. StancyIllinois Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API