Legal Opinion
Collier v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'n
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Arkansas
Decided December 30, 1902PublishedCited by 9 opinions
On Motion by Defendant to Quash the Service of Summons.
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, District Judge.
This suit was brought in the state court, and removed by the defendant to this court. A motion is now filed by the defendant to quash the service, for the reason, as alleged, that at the time of said service it was not doing business in the state of Arkansas, nor did it have any agent therein. The record shows that the return of the sheriff is in due form, and was made both upon Geo. B. Rose and upon T. C. Monroe, auditor of the state of Arkansas., A stipulation has been filed by which it is agreed:
“That the defendant company complied with the statutes of Arkansas in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. SpratleySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Magoffin v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Lesser Cotton Co. v. YatesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1901
3Cited by9 opinions
- Brown-Ketcham Iron Works v. George B. Swift Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1913
- Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'n v. TuchfeldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1908
- Meixell v. American Motor Car Sales Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1914
- Omaha Hardwood Lumber Co. v. J. H. Phipps Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- Davis v. Kansas & Texas Coal Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Arkansas · 1904
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.