Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re the Probate of the Will of Bahrenburg

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided October 17, 1951PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rubenstein, S.

The proponent moves to dismiss the objections filed by a nephew of decedent to the probate of the two instruments dated respectively May 1, 1946, and September 23, 1946, propounded as decedent’s last will and testament and codicil thereto on the ground he is not a person authorized to contest such instruments. A named legatee and the special guardian for infant parties join in the prayer for such relief.

The objectant is not a distributee of decedent, his mother, Adeline Wildhack, a sister of decedent having survived. Under the terms of the propounded instrument objectant shares…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re the Probate of the Will of DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  2. In Re the Probate of the Will of CookNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. In re Proving Last Will & Testament of HoytNew York Surrogate's Court · 1907
  4. In re EnnisNew York Surrogate's Court · 1929
  5. In re the Probate of the Will of WallaceNew York Surrogate's Court · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of SilvermanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1977
  2. In re the Estate of MorseNew York Surrogate's Court · 1998
  3. In re the Probate of the Will of SalkindNew York Surrogate's Court · 1958
  4. In re the Estate of BasileNew York Surrogate's Court · 1970
  5. In re the Estate of EisenfeldNew York Surrogate's Court · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API