Butler v. Walter
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Pine, J. P. (dissenting).
I respectfully dissent and would reverse because I conclude that Supreme Court erred in holding that respondent’s determination to create preferred eligible lists pursuant to Civil Service Law § 81 (1) was based on an error of law and was arbitrary and capricious and without a rational basis.
The preferred eligible lists at issue were created as a result of layoffs by the Onondaga County Correction Department caused by budget cuts. Respondent determined pursuant to Civil Service Law § 81 (1) that the Onondaga County Sheriff’s Department was within the same…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pagano v. New York State Civil Service CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Butler v. WalterNew York Supreme Court · 1993