United States v. Douglas Crooked Arm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1DissentNguyen, Circuit Judge
Crooked Arm’s and Shane’s felony sentences violate Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), because the conspiracy object to which they admitted — selling migratory bird feathers — was only a misdemeanor. Yet the majority refuses to reach the merits of Defendants’ sentencing argument because a prior panel purportedly “affirmed their felony convictions.” Majority Op. at 1067. The majority’s flawed reasoning is as follows: the prior panel, by not vacating the convictions, implicitly ruled that Defendants should be sentenced as felons on remand. But the panel…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Mabry v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Fiswick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leaburn ALEXANDER, Jr., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. James Earl MatthewsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- James Edward Hegler v. Robert G. Borg, Warden Dan LungrenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.