Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Fries

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 20, 1981No. 127PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge:

This appeal raises the question whether appellant’s conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol, a misdemeanor, was barred by the provisions of 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 110 1 dealing with multiple prosecutions for different offenses arising out of the same “criminal episode.” Appellant was charged with two offenses: driving under the influence and speeding, a summary offense. Appellant attempted to plead guilty to the summary offense by tendering payment of the fines and costs involved. The court below found that appellant’s attempted guilty plea was not accepted by the district…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CampanaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Commonwealth v. CampanaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Commonwealth. v. GreenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Commonwealth v. ErismanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Commonwealth v. BartleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CarelliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Commonwealth v. BeckmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Commonwealth v. BuecheleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Commonwealth v. Bittinger, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Somerset County1982
  5. Commonwealth v. BromleyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API