Ideal Werke A. G. Fur Drahtlose Telephonie v. Roos
City of New York Municipal Court
1Opinion of the CourtDonnelly, J.
Defendants concede that no part of the amount due on the note sued on herein has been paid. The testimony of the defendants’ witness, Stark, that he was authorized by plaintiff, a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the Republic of Germany, to, and did, open an office at 35 West Thirty-third street; that the plaintiff’s name appeared on the door of the office at that address and on the directory in the hallway of the entrance to the building; that he took the lease of the office, as well as the telephone service and the protective service in his own name;…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- International Fuel & Iron Corp. v. Donner Steel Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Angldile Computing Scale Co. v. GladstoneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- Lederwerke v. CapitelliNew York Supreme Court · 1915
- Rosenblatt v. Bridgeport Metal Goods Manufacturing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1918
3Cited by2 opinions
- Stafford-Higgins Industries, Inc. v. Gaytone Fabrics, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- Lebanon Mill Co. v. KuhnCity of New York Municipal Court · 1932