Alabama Consol. Coal & Iron Co. v. Baltimore Trust Co.
District Court, D. Maryland
In Equity. Suit by the Alabama Consolidated Coal & Iron Company and another against the Baltimore Trust Company. On motion for preliminary injunction.
1Opinion of the Court
ROSE, District Judge.
The Alabama Consolidated Coal & Iron Company is a complainant. It is a New Jersey corporation. It will be called the “Coal Company.” The other complainant is Joseph H. Hoadley. He is a citizen of New York. The bill alleges that he is a stockholder in the Coal Company. At the hearing it was admitted that he was not. The Baltimore Trust Company is the respondent. It is a Maryland corporation. It has succeeded the International Trust Company. The latter was also incorporated under the laws of Maryland. It is not material to distinguish between the two trust companies. Each…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Central Transportation Co. v. Pullman's Palace Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Thomas v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Handley v. StutzSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. LewisohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Epping v. City of ColumbusSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Uffelman v. BoillinCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1935
- National Bank of Commerce v. FrancisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1922
- Fleming v. GambleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1929
- In Re PHŒNIX HOTEL CO., LEXINGTON, KY.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1935
- Montrose Perpetual Building Ass'n v. PageCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.