Rengkley v. State

WIGGINTON, Judge.

Appellant was charged with and convicted of possession of more than twenty grams of cannabis and possession with the intent to sell or deliver marijuana. Appellant pled nolo contendere to these charges *1341reserving his right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress. The trial court denied the motion to suppress finding that the search warrant was based upon sufficient probable cause stemming from the reliability of the informant coupled with the police surveillance activities. The court so concluded despite its contemporaneous holding that the “anticipatory elements” of…