Brusegaard v. Ueland.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by petitioner from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Russell, J., denying a petition for an order directing defendant receiver to pay to petitioner-the sum of $1,192.86.
1Opinion of the CourtCanty, J.
At 12:30 p. m., December 29, 1896, the Washington Bank of Minneapolis suspended payment, and closed its doors. It was taken possession of by the state bank examiner that same afternoon, and on the next day a receiver in insolvency was appointed for it by the court. At and prior to these times the petitioner, Brusegaard, was doing business as a banker at Brandon, Minnesota, and kept an account in the Washington Bank, which was his correspondent. He„ filed a petition in the insolvency proceedings, in which he states that he had for some time prior to December 29 remitted to said bank,
“For…
2Cited by16 opinions
- City of Douglas v. Federal Reserve Bank of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Raynor v. Scandinavian-American BankWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- In Re Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
- City State Bank in Wellington v. National Bank of Commerce of AltusCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
- Acme Hay & Mill Feed Co. v. Metropolitan National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.