Boxer v. Topalian
Civil Court of the City of New York
1Opinion of the CourtGuy Gilbert Ribaudo, J.
Even though the courts are prone to allow the opening of default judgments, the statutes and the cases are equally clear that same should be denied upon the failure to show a meritorious defense and mistake, or excusable neglect, etc. (N. Y. City Civ. Ct. Act, § 101, subd. [b]; Civ. Prac. Act, § 108; Fitzgerald Mfg. Co. v. Alexander, 200 App. Div. 164; Titus v. Halsted, 209 App. Div. 66; Fritz v. Farber, 11 Misc 2d 485; Wasserman v. Tortora, 15 Misc 2d 1000; Child-Fit Mfg. Co. v. Pillow Express, 17 Misc 2d 147).
The affidavits in support of the motion herein are replete with eonclusory…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rothschild v. HavilandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- Fitzgerald Manufacturing Co. v. AlexanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Titus v. HalstedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Fritz v. FarberAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1958
- Wasserman v. TortoraAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.