Legal Opinion

People v. Perkins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 12, 1991PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The prosecutor’s cross-examination of defendant’s alibi witness was proper. The prosecutor was testing the basis for the witness’s ability to recall details concerning the night in question and did not imply that the witness had an obligation to report her exculpatory information to the authorities (c.f, People v Dawson, 50 NY2d 311). By failing to object to the prosecutor’s summation, defendant has failed to preserve for review any argument concerning the propriety thereof.

*616Grand larceny in the fourth degree, which requires the taking from the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. GloverNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. People v. DawsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. People v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  4. People v. CrandallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  5. People v. HarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. SidneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API